Is measuring aircraft noise better?

2 minutes read

"The experience of people living near airports is not always in line with the results of noise calculations. They have more confidence in noise measurements, but would a measurement approach also provide more protection?"

The legal framework for aircraft noise in the Netherlands is based on calculations. The advantages of calculations are predictability and fairness. Predictability helps with planning operations, providing clarity on noise pollution beforehand. Fairness stems from the uniform method of calculation.

Standards for noise measurements provide a guarantee that the measured noise level has an accuracy of 1 dB if the correct equipment is used under the right weather conditions. The result of the noise measurement can therefore have a variation of ± 0.5 dB. For airports like Schiphol with more than 450,000 flights per year, a difference of 0.5 dB in the annual noise pollution results in an uncertainty margin of at least 55,000 flights. This uncertainty margin does not occur with noise calculations. Moreover, every flight movement can be part of the calculation, unlike measurements, which cannot guarantee the accuracy of 1 dB under all weather conditions.

NLR believes that measurements are important. Measurements can be used to test the results of calculations against reality. The calculation methods used must be able to accurately predict an increase or decrease in noise pollution and include the elements that realistically represent the use of new flight procedures or new engines, so that quieter flying is fairly rewarded. Measurements can be used to demonstrate that a calculation model meets these requirements. As a knowledge organisation, NLR is committed to further improving noise calculation methods within the Netherlands and internationally.

For more information on measuring aircraft noise, please refer to the NLR publication NLR-TP-2014-037 on the subject of ‘measuring aircraft noise’.

About the author: Dick is an environmental advisor and project leader at NLR. He is a member of international working groups that improve and harmonise calculation methods for noise contours around airports.

Latest blogs

28 October 2025

When the going gets tough

With great anticipation, I look forward to the Tweede Kamer elections on 29 October. Even the ballot paper itself is impressive, with over a thousand candidates spread across 27 parties. The political debate is dominated by a wide range of themes, with opinions often poles apart. This also applies within the field of Royal NLR - Netherlands Aerospace Centre. Should Lelystad Airport remain open for both defence and civil aviation, or should it remain closed for commercial flights? And how do we make aviation more sustainable - and who will foot the bill? These are just a few examples of the many ambitions outlined in party manifestos.

Blu sky Airplane and clouds

04 June 2024

What about CO2 emissions and flight distance?

Over a fortnight ago, PVV, VVD, NSC and BBB presented their Outline Agreement. The Budget Annex shows that the parties want to differentiate the current air passenger tax by distance, with the ticket tax on longer flights becoming higher than that on shorter flights. The agreement does not explicitly specify what the incoming cabinet considers a ‘short’ or a ‘long-haul’ flight.

Take-off KLM vliegtuig vanaf Schiphol Airport
Sustainability and Environment

12 January 2024

Details are not laughable

I will confess right away: I’m not much of a Lubach fan. However justified his coverage of topics, and regardless of how well the editors often research these topics, the jokes and effects do more harm than good with me.